Mystery surrounds an “agent” which has been reprimanded by the advertising watchdog.

The firm uses a logo on its website making it look as though it won last year’s Sunday Times and Times estate agency of the year but yesterday organiser Peter Knight said that the agent was totally unknown to him.

He said it had not even entered for an award, let alone won one.

The agent, Hugo West, also does not appear to belong to the industry bodies referenced on its own website, including TPO, NALS and SAFEagent.

Today, West Property Consultants Ltd, trading as Hugo West, has had two complaints upheld against it by the Advertising Standards Authority.

An unnamed complainant – apparently a member of the public and not a competitor – challenged what Hugo West, which claims to cover Islington, Finsbury Park and Highbury in north London, said on its website.

The complainant challenged claims that the firm is a member of various industry bodies.

The complainant also challenged a property listing on the site SpareRoom.mobi, which stated: “Whole property: £900pcm . . . Security deposit: £900.”

The complainant said that the industry logos and claims were misleading because the agent was not a member of the organisations listed and had not received the award.

The complainant said the property listing was misleading because the stated deposit and rent were incorrect and the listing did not state non-optional fees.

Hugo West did not respond to the ASA’s inquiries, and the ASA upheld both complaints.

The matter has now been referred to the Committee of Advertising Practice’s compliance team.

But a little digging by EYE shows an extraordinary picture of a business which also claims to be the UK’s leading estate agency website.

Unfortunately, we have been unable to give Hugo West’s side of the story because, like the ASA, we have failed to make contact. The phone was not picked up on the two occasions we tried yesterday.

All the claims as to various memberships and that it won last year’s Sunday Times and Times Estate Agency of the Year gold are still on the website, which claims that the firm started in 1981.

Documents available online as to the directors say that Hugo West is 25 and was born in 1990. His Linked In profile says he has been managing director of West Group since 2000 – which means he became managing director at the age of ten.

Yet other records available online say he was appointed company director in 2013.

Mr West also appears to be director of Sheri’s Hair and Beauty, and Confused Landlords.co.uk

Yesterday, the site was not just showing the NALS, TPO, SAFEagents and estate agency of the year logos, but also a Foxtons Mini.

Text includes quite a bit of Latin, which is usually suggestive of a beta website, and contains many spelling mistakes, as well as a chunk of text which looks as though it has come straight off Foxtons’ website.

The Hugo West site also mentions that it offers guaranteed rent and under this part of the site, claims to be one of the UK’s leading providers of guaranteed rent with “83 offices nationawaide” [sic].

The company further claims: “With hundreds of thousands of visitors every month, hugowest.co.uk is the UK’s leading estate agency website. Renowned for its innovative approach to showcasing properties, our website plays a pivotal role in the professional marketing of your property.”

Peter Knight, of Estate Agency Events which organises the highly prestigious Sunday Times and The Times awards scheme, said yesterday: “This firm has never entered for, or won, one of our awards.”

We asked the Advertising Standards Authority, which publishes its ruling this morning, whether the complaint came from a bona fide source, and how much investigation it did into firms.

A spokesperson told us: “The complainant was (to the best of our knowledge) a member of the public. Competitors have to agree to be named in any published ruling if they want us to take up their complaint.

“We were satisfied that it was a bona fide complaint.

“The ASA can only regulate the content of ads to ensure that claims are not likely to mislead, harm or offend.

“Of course, in some instances, our investigations into misleading advertising uncover wide problems with the trading practices (that go beyond our remit) of companies, but that is where Trading Standards or other enforcement bodies would come in.”

Should Hugo West contact EYE, we will of course give its side of the story.

The firm’s website is here