Do agents really operate a ‘mysterious’ business model that makes pyramid selling look like a school tuck shop?

That is the accusation of property writer Jayne Dowle in the Spectator, under the headline that suggests what agents do is money for old rope.

She makes a number of claims, finding out first-hand that selling and buying a home really is stressful (we honestly think our readers know that).

However Dowle has issues. These include that the valuer might not be the negotiator; and that his (Dowle doesn’t seem to think it might be ‘her’) job is simply to get the listing.

Dowle also argues that the valuer’s clipboard bearing local comparables is actually designed to make sellers drop their price by £10,000 – and is equally unreliable.

Then there’s the whole sordid business of flogging mortgages and conveyancing.

Not to mention the agents outside London who don’t open on Saturdays, who expect sellers to do all their own viewings, and who still use local newspaper advertising because they don’t do social media.

Dowle also complains about the long lock-in contracts.

The piece is well written and interesting. It may be nothing like the way you operate; on the other hand, it may ring some bells.

If so, should they be alarm bells?

The interesting thing for a national property writer like Dowle is – how many estate agents will continue to trust her with their take on the market, when she portrays many as so shifty.

Thinking about it, could what agents do be worse than pyramid selling? That, after all, is when no one actually sells anything.

But agents do have to sell a real piece of real estate before they make their money

Well, most (not all) do!

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/10/estate-agent-house/