OnTheMarket will not drop its ‘one other portal rule’, a national newspaper has reported.
And legal letters chasing up arrears and/or breaches of that rule were sent to only “a very small minority” of OTM member agents.
Both points emerge in a story in the Financial Times, which has picked up on claims that ‘hundreds’ of agents have received legal letters either chasing up payment and/or seeking to enforce the ‘one other portal’ rule.
The FT story quotes OTM boss Ian Springett as saying that support for the new portal “continues to grow” and that it has “no plans to relax the ‘one other portal’ rule”.

Comments (7)
I have no plans to advertise with OTM
But should I ?
I am with Z & RM do I need OTM ?
Unless OTM change their stance I shall probably never know. Then again if OTM generate more traffic than Z I might take that chance and swop.
Seems to me OTM are making a rod for their own back.
Property Paddy – you say
“I am with Z & RM do I need OTM ?”
The reality is that only YOU can answer that one.
There are several questions that will make the answer come to you.
1. Do you ‘need’ both portals you currently list on.
2. Do you feel you get ‘value for money’ from them?
3. Do you feel that you have control of your listings?
4. Do you look forward to yearly price increases for no added value?
5. Do you feel as if the portals have the upper hand in the relationship?
6. Do you mind the fact that corporate shareholders are reaping the benefits of your subscription payments?
7. Do you mind that the ‘core membership rate’ you pay is whatever the Rep talked you into on the day of the appointment (plus the subsequent yearly uplifts…)?
8. Do the words ‘Rightmove’ and ‘Zoopla’ usually come out of your mouth between gritted teeth?
Okay – the last one is a bit of a joke – but I know plenty that do exactly that!
If you say ‘no’ to questions 1-4, and ‘yes’ to 5-8 – then you clearly need to do SOMETHING.
Whether that is to drop one/both and list on OTM – or simply to drop one or both – is your choice.
One thing for sure – if one way or another you and the countless numbers of Agents who score high on the above took a small nibble out of the elephant(s), then things could surely only improve.
PIE is a publication for the industry, and as such I am interested, as a supporter from the start of OTM to read these stories. If you are not interested in the story headline – move on to the next one !
As I have said many times on this subject, I am still unsure as to why a few agents are unhappy with OTM. We all knew it would take time, and this is the reason we committed to 5 years. Secondly, since dropping Zoopla, this has not affected my business at all. Most leads generated by Rightmove and Zoopla are of a low quality requesting more information relating to properties with the information requested already detailed in my advertisements.
I analyse EVERY lead generated by these portals for my business and I have notice that most days OTM is generating as many QUALITY leads as Rightmove, just not as many ‘enquiries’. I can only assume that there are many individuals just ‘browse’ Rightmove as they have done for many years and have probably been registered with them for many years and thus generate a great deal of poorer leads.
The issue of fees was discussed at the OTM meetings, and after discussions with many of my local competitors after, we felt that recruiting more agents with lower fees was the way forward. What many do not seem to grasp is that these agents are not part of Agents Mutual and do not have voting rights and thus the offering is somewhat different to those of us that joined as GOLD members. I INVESTED for my future !
How does publication of the full article alter anything? Everything mentioned above has already appeared within PIE. What is your agenda here?
Don’t expect ‘Lamby45’ to come clean, PP – I suspect the reality would make his/her credibility… difficult to argue positively.
I generally like the coverage on this website but on this subject you really let yourselves down – especially when you will know that the vast majority of your readership won’t have an FT subscription. You make it sound like it is a positive news story. I do have an FT subscription so I have copied the story here for the benefit of your readers.